首页> 外文OA文献 >A public choice view on the climate and energy policy mix in the EU: how do the emissions trading scheme and support for renewable energies interact?
【2h】

A public choice view on the climate and energy policy mix in the EU: how do the emissions trading scheme and support for renewable energies interact?

机译:关于欧盟气候和能源政策组合的公众选择观点:排放交易计划与可再生能源支持如何相互作用?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this paper, we analyze the rationale for an energy policy mix when the European Emissions Trading scheme (ETS) is considered from a public choice perspective. That is, we argue that the economic textbook model of the ETS implausibly assumes 1) efficient policy design and 2) climate protection as the single objective of policy intervention. Contrary to these assumptions, we propose that the ETS originates from a political bargaining game within a context of multiple policy objectives. In particular, the emissions cap is negotiated between regulators and emitters with the emitters’ abatement costs as crucial bargaining variable. This public choice view yields striking implications for an optimal policy mix comprising RES supporting policies. Whereas the textbook model implies that the ETS alone provides sufficient climate protection, our analysis suggests that support for renewable energies 1) contributes to a more effective ETS‐design and 2) may even increase the overall efficiency of climate and energy policy if other externalities and policy objectives besides climate protection are considered. Thus, our analysis also shows that a public choice view not necessarily entails negative evaluations concerning efficiency and effectiveness of a policy mix.
机译:在本文中,我们从公共选择的角度分析了在考虑欧洲排放交易计划(ETS)时采用能源政策的基本原理。也就是说,我们认为,ETS的经济教科书模型令人难以置信地假设1)有效的政策设计和2)气候保护是政策干预的单一目标。与这些假设相反,我们认为ETS源自在多个政策目标的背景下的政治讨价还价博弈。特别是,排放上限是由监管机构和排放者之间协商确定的,排放者的减排成本是至关重要的议价变量。这种公共选择观点对包含RES支持政策的最佳政策组合产生了惊人的启示。教科书模型暗示仅ETS就能提供足够的气候保护,但我们的分析表明,对可再生能源的支持1)有助于更有效的ETS设计,以及2)如果存在其他外部因素,甚至可以提高气候和能源政策的整体效率。除气候保护外,还考虑了其​​他政策目标。因此,我们的分析还表明,公共选择的观点不一定会对政策组合的效率和效力进行负面评价。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号